<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>Social Media Discussion Tag: ning</title>
<link>http://www.socialmediamagazine.com/social-tags/</link>
<description>Social Media Discussion Tag: ning</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 01:07:03 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>Dallas on "Ning Private Networking Invite Privileges for Non-Admin Members"</title>
<link>http://www.socialmediamagazine.com/social-tags/topic/ning-private-networking-invite-privileges-for-non-admin-members#post-5</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 19:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Dallas</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">5@http://www.socialmediamagazine.com/social-tags/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Ning's business model is based on community marketing so even in a private model (where a group creator only wants selected members to participate) anyone invited can then invite others.  &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;There is an option for the group creator to approve all new member requests but that's a little anti-social when your private group of 'best friends' doesn't get the model and invites 5 of her friends to join also. &#60;a href=&#34;http://networkcreators.ning.com/forum/topic/show?id=492224%3ATopic%3A129657&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://networkcreators.ning.com/forum/topic/show?id=492224%3ATopic%3A129657&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;The creators group on Ning addresses this issue with a CSS hack to hide the &#34;invite&#34; privilege for non-admin memebrs but the share feature still allows for an invite to be sent out. (I have not seen this share email but it's mentioned in the post)&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;The social networking features are really impressive but social group controls aer critical if I plan to create social networks for both my public and private groups and know that I'll be able to control the whole thing once it's actually working.  The pricing for &#34;above free&#34; levels of bandwidth and space would seem to be enough justification for giving group creators this additional control and making this the ultimate social networking tool.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>admin on "Ning Social Networks"</title>
<link>http://www.socialmediamagazine.com/social-tags/topic/ning-social-networks#post-4</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">4@http://www.socialmediamagazine.com/social-tags/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Ning (Ning.com) is a fast growing social networking site.  What experiences and comments do you have about this social platform?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Review: &#60;a href=&#34;http://www.socialmediamagazine.com/social-platforms/13-social-platforms/38-ning-social-networking-platform&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://www.socialmediamagazine.com/social-platforms/13-social-platforms/38-ning-social-networking-platform&#60;/a&#62;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
